![frank baum wizard of oz series frank baum wizard of oz series](https://image.invaluable.com/housePhotos/LeonardAuction/28/704828/H21444-L260436314.jpg)
It’s odd to think of whimsical children’s literature so seemingly innocuous as The Wizard of Oz books as territory in the long culture wars of the 20th century. The attorney who represented plaintiff Vicki Frost called on “every born-again Christian to get their children out of public schools.” In 1986, a group of Fundamentalist Christian families in Tennessee came together to remove the The Wizard of Oz from their schools’ curriculum, protesting “the novel’s depiction of benevolent witches.” They argued, writes Rosenthal, “that all witches are bad, therefore it is ‘theologically impossible ‘for good witches to exist.” Many seeking to ban the books since have similarly referred to their positive depictions of magic and “godless supernaturalism,” but the Tennessee case stands as a landmark in the Religious Right’s litigious crusade against the government. Other groups decided that the books promoted witchcraft in charges similar to those levied at the Harry Potter series. One Florida librarian circulated a memo to her colleagues calling the books “unwholesome,” among other things, and causing a run on local bookstores as children desperately tried to find them. The Detroit public library banned the Oz books in 1957, stating they had “no value for children of today.” The ban remained in place until 1972.
![frank baum wizard of oz series frank baum wizard of oz series](https://www.blackgate.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-Wonderful-Wizard-of-Oz.jpg)
( You can find them all in text and audio format here.) And yet, “throughout the years the books have been opposed for their positive portrayals of femininity.” Various libraries used similar excuses to ban the books throughout the 50s and 60s.
Frank baum wizard of oz series series#
Frank Baum’s fantasy novel initiated a series of 13 Oz-themed sequels, all of which became immensely popular after MGM’s 1939 film adaptation. Not so much in 1928, when the Chicago Public Library banned The Wizard of Oz, writes Kristina Rosenthal at the University of Tulsa Department of Special Collections, “arguing that the story was ungodly for ‘depicting women in strong leadership roles.’”įirst published in 1900, L. And we can support a cultural industry thriving on strong female characters in fiction, film, and television. At least these days we can openly have the-often highly inflamed-conversation about sexism in business, entertainment, and government. That opponent, of course, happens to be the first woman to run on a major party ticket in a general election.ĭo many Americans still have a problem with accepting women as leaders? I personally don’t think there’s much of an argument there, and people who see the question as redundant marvel at how long archaic attitudes about women in power have persisted. One candidate, a known and well-documented misogynist, leads millions of supporters calling for his opponent’s death, imprisonment, and humiliation. Still, one would have to work very hard on either side, I think, to deny the role sexism has played. so polarized that-as The Wall Street Journal chillingly demonstrates in their “ Blue Feed Red Feed” feature-the left and right seem to live in two entirely different realities. We’ve reached the final stretch of the most infuriating, unsettling election I’ve ever experienced.